Any thoughts on the Anthony verdict?

[Lady G]

I think she, and/or she and members of her family are definitely guilty of something or a cover up of something.The jury had an option in special circumstances to call it manslaughter via the aggravted child abuse grounds and opted not to. The verdict doesn't absolve her from any responsibility. Just states the evidence wasn't there, for them to convict her.

Agree with ya here Bob'O. I wasn't on the jury, I don't know what they saw/heard, I can't say what I would of done in that case.

What was never answered was what happened to Caylee? He (she) who lies the best goes free! At the very least she should have been found guilty of child neglect.

I am amazed how ignorant the DA was to say that the murder weapon was the duct tape on the child's mouth. It is simply not possible to fall off the skin and then magically reattach itself to the skull. The state's case was rushed and not well-thought out. It isn't that the defense did a great job, the state did a lousy job of presenting it's case.

Rather than rush to judgement on a poorly presented case, the state could have prosecuted Casey for the thefts which would have held her over in prison while they pursued a more sound case. In the worse case scenario, let her run free while you assemble your case.

Well, said. If anyone wants to be mad at someone for the outcome of this trial, it's the DA that is to blame.

This woman was most defiantly a horrible mother, the fact she waited 31 days to report her daughter missing say's it all, her partying and dancing and entering hard body contests while others were looking for her daughter...yeah no Mother of the year award there...I'm pretty positive she had something to do with what happened, knows what happened, but to say I know she was the one who murdered her I can't. I believe the jury did what they could with what they had

 

[FISHSHROD]

I'm tired , good night :bs:

 

[JcbPeebles]

How can you be appalled if you weren't watching it closely? You wouldn't have enough information to form a fair opinion without watching it closely. Hell, you wouldn't have enough information with watching it closely since the media outlets are entirely incompetent when it comes to reporting court cases.

I really don't get how people get their image of the modern justice system. They watch news coverage and suddenly think their opinion is better then people who have been forced to basically study all the evidence and listen to arguments the whole time.

All the information is logged on numerous credited websites include posts that are unbiased, take about 10 minutes to find out all the information that is available out there including what you have seen of it im sure.
Did you sit in on the trial? im guessing so because you see you have a opinion and a view of the justice system, and if not from in the court room it must have been from the same sources we all has access to, the same incompetent media outlets would then be fueling your opinions also?

Just because people have a different opinion doesn't mean they think its better than theirs,


=]

-Sir JacobPeebles!

 

[alan j t]

not cool. dont claim your kid missing, party while she is missing/dead. and dont go to jail for the rest of your life.

 

[alan j t]

I wonder how many people that honestly think she's innocent would have her over as a babysitter.

I don't think she should've been tried for murder either, but manslaughter, definitely. The defense claimed that she drowned in the pool, yet she let it go for a month before reporting anything, and then let hundreds of people and who-knows how much time/money do a futile search for her, meanwhile partying hard like everything is all good.

I get that she put it in the closet and tried to pretend like her life was normal, or whatever, her miles of lies shows that. I've known some people very closely who are pathological liars, so I get it, but I don't think it should absolve her from responsibility for what happened to the child.

i agree 100%

 

[Khemul]

All the information is logged on numerous credited websites include posts that are unbiased, take about 10 minutes to find out all the information that is available out there including what you have seen of it im sure.
Did you sit in on the trial? im guessing so because you see you have a opinion and a view of the justice system, and if not from in the court room it must have been from the same sources we all has access to, the same incompetent media outlets would then be fueling your opinions also?

Just because people have a different opinion doesn't mean they think its better than theirs,


=]

-Sir JacobPeebles!

My head hurts now.

 

[spencerguy1]

This is a stupid case. If she really had no idea about who murdered her child, than she would be trying to find out 24/7, devoting her time to getting justice for her daughter, but undead she's partying again. Abd as for the prosecution and jury, i could have found twice as many cres to convict her of then them. In the blago case, they broke up each crime into a bunch of different offences. All they find here is murder, manslaughter, child abuse, and lying to the FBI. Let's see, I could add on-child neglect, she's still lying right now, I bet she was over the legal alcohol limit when she killed caylee, that lady is a criminal!

 

[Rbishop]

You know people jump on people for selling the rights to their stories and writing books and basically becoming rich, in the short term, but the truth is what else is she going to do. I mean no company in their right minds would hire her.

That's going to be another interesting legal twist...not sure, yet, of the laws regarding it in Florida, but she was found guilty of the lies...wonder if that will prevent her from profitting on her story....

 

[SubRosa]

If profiting from lies were illegal......nevermind

 

[londonloco]

I'm not happy with the verdict either, but it's up to the prosecution to prove guilt, not the public or the media. The true tragedy here is the death of a child. Everything else pales....