BS FOR SURE
Thanks for your amazing opinion...any scientific data to back that up or are you just going to leave it at that?![]()
I think it meant "Cow" ? Lots more of'em.
BS FOR SURE
Thanks for your amazing opinion...any scientific data to back that up or are you just going to leave it at that?![]()
Quantifying trends in NPP, as we have sought to do here, is necessary but not sufficient for understanding land surface net ecosystem exchange of C[O.sub.2]. The same climatic changes that have caused decadal-scale increases in NPP can also change aboveground and belowground carbon allocation, decomposition rates, disturbance regimes, and other processes that cycle carbon between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere
All I can say is this "summer' we had only two weeks with over 90 temps. Usually we have two months. And sometimes more. It was 30 this morning.Every time someone brings up the topic of global warming on the forums, 10 people line up to talk about how it's bad science or bs. Any one of those with that inclination care to put some money where their mouth is and offer up some sources? I've seen scads of info that argue strongly for the presence of global warming at the hand of man, but very little credible documentation arguing against it. Being of skeptical nature though, I'd like to see what the other side has to say. Anyone care to show some scientific texts of a non politicized nature to back up the argument against global warming?