Mafia #69: Ghost Hunters Game Thread

[dirtydawg10]

I'm not speculating about innocents, I'm speculating about who I think is scum. If I were scum I wouldn't have to speculate about innocents in the thread, because afik, scum can communicate with each other off site and everyone who is not communicating on day 1 is innocent.



If I were evil I would never have brought it up in the thread, I would have brought it up in the scum den chat.


Idk why she got nervous and switched her vote. Suddenly she didn't find you as scummy so she moved, and she's claiming it was a pro-town move. Iirc, she claimed her move was much more pro-town than staying on someone she no longer thought was scummy.

If you were scum you would have hit me because you think I'm scum??? Doesn't make any sense. The only reason to make that comment is because you think I'm innocent.

 

[[AC] maelstrom]

Huh? Noods said she could see me putting a hit on Kash. I said that Kash would not be my choice of a hit if I were scum. I don't know what the heck you're saying Mael. It's not a defense, it was simply a response to the hypothesis Noods put out there.

YOU USED IT AS A REASON WHY YOU ARE NOT SCUM

thats a defense :shakehead:

 

[johnlarson66]

Looks like I have made some new friends. CCM and Wiz seem to have me high on their lists.

Wiz has claimed I did not answer Kash's questions, but I think I answered them earlier in the day, then an hour before nightfall she posts 14 questions for me. I answered what I could.

Wiz also jumped on board with my response to LG about my actions. I think LG's response was that I did something to FF. Really, I do not think I gave FF a lot of pressure nor did I really ride him much. His bad for the both of us comment made no sense and FF should be past that by now. I also thought the arguement placed by Ice that FF would do a bad job at picking investigations was highly suspect. I felt Ice was protecting the FF, who could have been the prime evil.

I don't mind people having me leaning evil. I never have. I do mind people trying to make a case out of nothing. CCM is trying to say I have backed off, what is he even talking about, the guy is a part time poster as it is and mostly post dribble. Wiz seems to be on me hot and heavy. I can't recall, but I think both of these guys had me as top suspects on day one.

Wiz has a question for me to answer -

You really expect us to believe that you wouldn't have Kashta hit when she posted enough coherent thoughts and questions that you deemed it necessary to side step and avoid them?

Is that your big question? Really?

I would not have hit Kash. Period. Even if she was hot on me. Most people don't trust her either, so who really listens to her? I also would not have hit her because she is a great suspect. Plus with this new twist where the dead innocents get to talk and help, I would have not wanted her in that group. I would have hit a low poster or player who I felt would not contribute much in the afterlife. I do not think I side stepped or avoided Kash's questions.

 

[Lady G]

I'm not speculating about innocents, I'm speculating about who I think is scum. If I were scum I wouldn't have to speculate about innocents in the thread, because afik, scum can communicate with each other off site and everyone who is not communicating on day 1 is innocent.



If I were evil I would never have brought it up in the thread, I would have brought it up in the scum den chat.


Idk why she got nervous and switched her vote. Suddenly she didn't find you as scummy so she moved, and she's claiming it was a pro-town move. Iirc, she claimed her move was much more pro-town than staying on someone she no longer thought was scummy.

I don't get the logic, if she didn't feel he was as scummy it IS pro-town to move her vote off him.

 

[Lab_Rat]

BUT, no one asked...she just put it out there herself, THEN of course it was asked as to why him, to which her response was because she was thinking him a PR. BIG difference IMO. IF someone had actually asked maybe I would see it differently. Although personally if I was asked I would just of said I didn't know who I would of picked.

I responded to Noods accusation that I was the one who put the hit on Kash. If I could take it back I would, but I can't. It's out there, I think Dawg is scum. Maybe the dead spirits would be kind enough to investigate him...

 

[IceH2O]

I agree that JL has responded like a politician but IMO this is how he plays. He does not get defensive and try to justify his actions - they are what they are - like it or not....not saying this makes him innocent - just saying he is a good player and hard to get a read on.....I cannot say that I have "seen" anything scummy. He is one of the players I never know which way to lean....:huh:

How about the repeated sidestepping of questions. I've asked numerous times what he thought of Labs pre nightfall post, no answer.

I'd also like to know from JL what he thinks of JRRs posts and hit and run posts?

 

[dirtydawg10]

I responded to Noods accusation that I was the one who put the hit on Kash. If I could take it back I would, but I can't. It's out there, I think Dawg is scum. Maybe the dead spirits would be kind enough to investigate him...

I have no problems being investigated...but are you asking so that when you hit me tonight there will be a wasted investigation?

 

[Lab_Rat]

If you were scum you would have hit me because you think I'm scum??? Doesn't make any sense. The only reason to make that comment is because you think I'm innocent.

YOU USED IT AS A REASON WHY YOU ARE NOT SCUM

thats a defense :shakehead:

I don't get the logic, if she didn't feel he was as scummy it IS pro-town to move her vote off him.

My thought is she moved off of someone who was at risk to be lynched onto someone who was not. If she truly didn't think he was scum then yeah, but why the last minute move? The timing is what stuck out most to me.

 

[IceH2O]

I responded to Noods accusation that I was the one who put the hit on Kash. If I could take it back I would, but I can't. It's out there, I think Dawg is scum. Maybe the dead spirits would be kind enough to investigate him...

You guys can't be putting names out there and saying they should be investigated, a list of names yes but not a single name. All that does is give the scum a hit target and a wasted investigation. I'm pretture they look at our suspect list of who they think they can trust and make their choices from that.

Now Lab maybe you can stop posting defenses and give us a suspect list and why....

 

[the wizard]

You put it out there....and now you act like I'm dragging it out of you?


Yup.


Here's the thing that worries me, Wiz. You've been going nuts about this question for awhile now, so I looked back and couldn't find any questions that weren't loaded rhetorical questions.

You continually slugging away at JL over an unanswered question, when you don't really expect an answer isn't the most pro-town thing to do. Questions are more for gathering actual information, not shoveling scum onto other players. If you are going to ask loaded rhetorical questions, that's fine...just don't continually jump up and down when they're not answered, as you just admitted that the purpose of the question is just to heap scum on someone (versus actually obtaining any useful information).

Fair enough Mad, my question was rhetorical.

It still doesn't change the way he riled FF up yesterday or the fact that the questions he sidestepped from Kashta were not rhetorical.

He has played enough games with FF to know that it doesn't matter what his role is if pressured he is going to post as he did.

So IMO, what he did was scummy.

We have all been asked and asked others questions. We do our best to answer them without sidestepping them.

Let me ask you this,disregarding my rhetorical question to him, do you not think he sidestepped some pointed questions from Kashta yesterday?

And if he did wouldn't you consider that scummy?