After that slip from Ice,I retract my vote on LG and vote to lynch Ice.
I think that's probably the best reason to vote him.
I think that's probably the best reason to vote him.
I wasn't protecting Ice but I was pointing out how I saw it and how I would have meant it if I had said it. I was going to correct him myself but decided not to since the question was for Pir and I wanted to see his responce to the wording.Why are you protecting Ice? His game play has seemed off to me and now he posts something that could have been a slip and you push it off as Ice being strategic?
I messed up the way I said that. I was trying to say that that's the best reason for a D1 vote.I think that's probably the best reason to vote him.
I highly doubt that he meant that to put me in a trap or whatever.I wasn't protecting Ice but I was pointing out how I saw it and how I would have meant it if I had said it. I was going to correct him myself but decided not to since the question was for Pir and I wanted to see his responce to the wording.
Interesting that this is where the hand picking speculation started. Pir asked the question but this answer that JPap "LIKES" to hand pick seems questionable. Then Pir goes and pokes the hornets nest and asks others to try and figure out who JPap would hand pick. Pir votes for LR and then retracts saying he thinks LR is innocent and was blackmailed. I admit I did think it was an interesting idea but now I think I may be seeing some links forming between these two. Post 390 Pir votes for LR and then retracts and votes for LG in post 397. For now...
I vote to lynch Pir
I just get the feeling that he is trying to stir up confusion among the innocents with his posting.
I have a few minutes before I need to leave again.
The possibility of Lab Rat being blackmailed into her vote on Dawg was a good suggestion, and one I hadn't considered yet.... I had seen that in the rules but for some reason it didn't stick in my head. But after thinking this over, I don't think even that explains away Lab's posting this game. Sure, if she were blackmailed to vote Dawg, a pro-town way of doing it would be to come up with the flimsiest reason she could think of to justify it. And I will grant her reasoning is very flimsy.
However, the blackmail thing only applies to a person's single vote. The Don wouldn't be able to make Lab Rat act scummy in other ways, which I feel she's been in several of her other posts.... not just who she picked to vote for and why.
That said, I'll leave my vote where it is.
I've also been thinking about Salt's behavior/attitude. Not sure who it was that already made the comment and I don't have time to go back to pull posts right now.... but someone had mentioned before that it isn't uncommon for a new player to join into a game, expecting it's appropriate to come across like a wise guy and just take the mafia theme persona too far. Noobs don't always realize they're supposed to pretend to be innocent (whether they are or not) and browsing through a game or two beforehand isn't going get that point across, specifically. I also feel any that among any possible mix of players who could be teamed together, at least one of them would be bound to tell Salt to lighten up or STFU already -- before he got himself into so much trouble. At this point, I'm not sure yet which way to lean Salt... which is why I don't like making day 1 judgements on noobs, even when they are acting suspicious.
i suppose they could fake a blackmail in that one of their members could suddenly change votes to that it looks like a balckmail, but if there really is only one i doubt they would do that. plus, since you cannot reveal that you are blackmailed they can't fake one. come to think of it, that kinda defeats the purpose of blackmailing a mafia member then...It's still a stretch, a strange vote among crazy votes will still be just that, a strange vote.
Why? They could just fake the blackmail, instead of using a valuable resourse?
:mad2: stealing my ideas? not cool dude.
Thats a waste of a vote IMO. Hes being unhelpful and scummish, and everyone knows it. He's pretty harmless as scum (unless he is the don or if voting gets close) so I'd go after a vet on D1, as they tend to be the ones who can turn games evil quickly.
Thank you for saying this bally, even though you stole my post. :mad2:
Care to explain why you voted me S4S, or care to post the magical "holy grail" of a list that you made?
hes been non-existant, I think he might UD.
it has been interesting....
I agree, JB is playing a lot like the time when me and him were scum. I remember he was quieter that game, as he has been for this one. I may be wrong, and feel free to double check that in case I am.
Zaffy is ussualy quiet, and haydn hasn't really posted anything at all. My question is to where PP is?
Anyone have a vote count going?
though i have referenced it above, i would like to hear it from him.Confirmed from JPap via email, there is only 1 blackmail.
i do think that it is important to all, but pappy did say numerous times he is having trouble with his internet at school.Would this not fall under the "if it is important to all" part??
Well I had a couple of late appointments today, but managed to get them in early so I could make night fall.
Pir, although blackmail was a possibility, you already confirmed that pap said there is only one. As others have posted, using it D1 is not worth it.
Did you know this already? Were you just trying to clear LR?
Reread the Game thread. Those voting LR aren't voting because of her vote.
Also did you completely miss her answer to me? The one where I questioned her not seeing anything scummy? Or were you advised to just sweep that under the carpet.
IMO, D1 has been dripping of scum in the postings. For anyone to not see anything scummy is either skimming or wearing blinders to their teammates posts. (IMO)