Mafia 79:Bio Badlands Game Thread.

G you can't read just the red words. Read the next line also.

Besides I don't honestly know why this is that important, or for that matter what John would have to gain by faking a babble !
The next line just simply states the obvious, if one of the two was used we would know who it was on because they would either be dead or babble, but from the statement it would be said which was used...I'm not sure it was. There was nothing about which vial was used.

It is important because if it wasn't used...then John flat out faked it and has to be evil, there is no other reason for him to "pretend" to of gotten the babble.
 
Mafia 79,bio-badlands sign up.

...

The Lab Worker: One of the Townies, Harpo Dermic, and with normal genetics, is a disgruntled ex-Lab Worker at the Secret Facility. Upon his firing, he left with 4 vials of serum from the facility. He has no clue as to which one, does what. A wild guess on my part will mention that (1) of them causes instant death, (1) of them just causes a person to make a babbling statement, but (2) of them will genetically alter a persons DNA. (ie: evil to normal or normal to evil).


Lab Worker will PM me on Nights 2,3,4 and 5 with what vial number he wants to use and on who. I will make note in the thread that it has occured and what the vial did. Obviously if a death or babble, you will know who. For the genetic switching, you will not. The Lab Worker will not admit to anyone, in or out of the thread who was affected. And just in case the Lab Worker is taken out early, the vials will msteriously arrive in someone else's hands.
...


see I read this as two different statements.

" I will make note in the thread that it has occured and what the vial did. "

The rest I see as a separate idea relating to who

"Obviously if a death or babble, you will know who. For the genetic switching, you will not. "
 
read the next line. if death or babble we will know who, otherwise we will not.
DO you see anything anywhere saying WHICH was used? No, that is the point had one been used it would of been said it was and which one, the next line really is moot because IF it was stated one was used....we would know who it was used on when it happened..it is a obvious statement, and more to let us know we wouldn't know who was switched if that one happened.

Example.....Lab worker used a vial tonight....someone will babble like a fool. Then we see who babbles and know who it was used on.
........Lab worker used a vial tonight and so/so is dead....we would know who it was used on because they are dead.
.......Lab worker used a vial tonight, someones genes have been altered...but we don't know who because THAT part would not be revealed.

The fact it wasn't stated it was used or which one, tells me it wasn't.
 
The order of events confuses the matter. The vial should not have been used as User was dead and could not use it. But if it wasn't used why were only three passed on?
 
see I read this as two different statements.

" I will make note in the thread that it has occured and what the vial did. "

The rest I see as a separate idea relating to who

"Obviously if a death or babble, you will know who. For the genetic switching, you will not. "
EXACTLY! It is two different things. Two different parts to one rule
 
The order of events confuses the matter. The vial should not have been used as User was dead and could not use it. But if it wasn't used why were only three passed on?
I would assume, UN attempted to use it...but it did not go through because he was dead...wasting it. That too should of been revealed IMO if it IS what happened. It should of said something about The Lab worker had a failed attempt or something.
 
AquariaCentral.com