Mafia #89 Trouble in Kindergarten

[Zaffy]

Fishfriend approaches Mr. Zaffys desk and quietly clears his throat. Mr. Zaffy is sound asleep. Fishfriend clears his throat a little louder and says "Mr. Zaffy, I need the potty."

Mr. Zaffy slowly sits up and stares at Fishfriend.

"So the potty mouth needs the potty. It'll cost you $10 to rent the potty pass. Also, I need a $50 cash deposit."

Fishfriend cries a little and begs "Please, can I just go, I really need to go"

Mr. Zaffy replies "Plus a $5 whining fee. That comes to $85 you owe me."

Reluctantly Fishfriend hands over the cash and takes the potty pass down out of the room and heads down the hall. Mr. Zaffy closes and locks the classroom door behind him.

FF won't be able to continue the game.

 

[jbradt]

Ok... a couple of things. First: Zaffy, are you gonna tell us FF's role?

Second... I was really hoping there would be some more to go on today. I'm a bit frustrated by the fact that so little is happening. Kash, your answers sound logical but then they always do. Something in them still doesn't ring true to me. Maybe it's a case of "the lady doth protest too much". Since I think you are the most likely suspect at this point, I vote to lynch Kashta.

 

[Zaffy]

Yes, I will reveal FF at recess.

 

[IceH2O]

I don't know how I missed this the first 4 times I read it.

I am evil for too much agreeing with Ice yet Ice said there wasn't to much he didn't agree with Kashta on.

Yes I agreed with Kash in mind, I didn't post I agreed with her in essence I wasn't trying to latch on like it feels you did.

I find it interesting, that when Ice posted this morning he totally disregarded my answer to his question. That, if I remember correctly is very un-Ice like.

Did my answer explain things to clearly as to why I didn't help lynch one of the twins?

It was early and I missed it. But I like how you stress "the twins". Why did you feel it was important to point that out Wiz? The question is rhetorical as I know the answer and anyone reading it should know also.

 

[IceH2O]

Fishfriend approaches Mr. Zaffys desk and quietly clears his throat. Mr. Zaffy is sound asleep. Fishfriend clears his throat a little louder and says "Mr. Zaffy, I need the potty."

Mr. Zaffy slowly sits up and stares at Fishfriend.

"So the potty mouth needs the potty. It'll cost you $10 to rent the potty pass. Also, I need a $50 cash deposit."

Fishfriend cries a little and begs "Please, can I just go, I really need to go"

Mr. Zaffy replies "Plus a $5 whining fee. That comes to $85 you owe me."

Reluctantly Fishfriend hands over the cash and takes the potty pass down out of the room and heads down the hall. Mr. Zaffy closes and locks the classroom door behind him.

FF won't be able to continue the game.

Ok... a couple of things. First: Zaffy, are you gonna tell us FF's role?

Fishfriend approaches Mr. Zaffys desk and quietly clears his throat. Mr. Zaffy is sound asleep. Fishfriend clears his throat a little louder and says "Mr. Zaffy, I need the potty."

Mr. Zaffy slowly sits up and stares at Fishfriend.

"So the potty mouth needs the potty. It'll cost you $10 to rent the potty pass. Also, I need a $50 cash deposit."

Fishfriend cries a little and begs "Please, can I just go, I really need to go"

Mr. Zaffy replies "Plus a $5 whining fee. That comes to $85 you owe me."

Reluctantly Fishfriend hands over the cash and takes the potty pass down out of the room and heads down the hall. Mr. Zaffy closes and locks the classroom door behind him.

FF won't be able to continue the game.

I'm going to assume FF was scum or Zaffy is just wasting our time because it would be tied 3-3 or there were only 2 scum to begin with.

 

[IceH2O]

First off, I am not having a good ****in week, so don't expect any miracles or niceties. Second off, I had a big post I had been working on from 7:40 am to 3:30pm, but it was lost to the ****** mac, so what your about to read is everything I was able to remember from that post. No promises. Third off, I'm sorry for not being here. JRP and other schoolwork, plus no wireless and a work-buisy mom = little time for mafia. Tack on a bad week and you have a deadly mixture. I'll try to stay in the game, but I can't say I'll be able to. So deal with it, Ice the almighty, cause "Slushie" ain't in the mood for stupid *** comments like this next one:



Thought 1: Jerk. Thought 2: Get over it. Thought 3: Better make thoughts one and two less aggressive, or I'll get yelled at.





Does seem odd. Someone to watch, I guess... seems odd you would say that so... vaguely, though.



Kashta attacks Wiz, JB, Rich, and Noods, all in one block of posts. Doesn't vote any of them, doesn't decide who she thinks is evilest, just muddies the water with opinions and questions. Could be digging, could be more sinister.



I sort of see this. And Ice would be good enough to pull it off, too. I think I'll keep watch on you, Ice.



Screw you. I wasn't going to play that day, so I voted no one. Next time, I'll just quit.



Why tentative? You made a case against her, did you know she was innocent before you voted her? I see no other reason for a "tentative" vote on Noods there.



Always peaks my interest when someone says they can't be evil because evil wouldn't do that. Just a lousy argument and will always get my attention and add them to my scumdar.





Took her a very long time to get to an answer for the question. I've done that before, usually when evil. Make a case against someone, but with nothing to back it, then have to find something to back it. Or just fail epicly and give up and say that I was wrong. Still, makes me think.





This may be stupid, but I have to say this looks almost planned. And if someone calls them on it, they can just say "Would mafia really be that obvious?" and deflect attention that way...

SO, all in all, my list would be:

DD: for defending herself badly and because of the Ice comment and the time it took to lay down an answer.

Kashta: For her "digging" that never really went anywhere, and for the "tentative" vote on noods after creating an argument for voting her.

Ice: For being an ***.

Wiz: Seems a little off to me, but it's been a while since I played with him so it could just be me.
And that's all I have to say right now.

Under the assumption that FF is scum I pulled his only relevant post. I will not vote Kashta. He had a reason for 4 players but the reasoning for Wiz is something scum would post to name a team mate but not push the envelope.

My vote will stay on Wiz. The only other person I feel could be the 3rd bully would be JB.

We as innocents can not be split,we need to agree on 1 person or they will roll over us.

 

[IceH2O]

1st we don't all have to agree but if we don't they can force a tie, not roll over us as there can only be 2 of them.

2nd I was looking at FFs post again and there is only 1 post he pulled of Wiz, why would that even deserve a suspect comment?

 

[jbradt]

It actually makes a lot of sense, Ice. I didn't think of FF's role in those terms. He almost has to be a bully... which is kind of ironic in my mind. I also have to agree that that being the case, Kash almost has to be innocent based on his attack on her. Hence... I retract my vote on Kash and vote to lynch DD. I still have some hesitation on Wiz. If FF is a bully, then it seems we've got a little breathing room.

 

[the wizard]

combining offices so I managed an early day today.

 

[the wizard]

Yes I agreed with Kash in mind, I didn't post I agreed with her in essence I wasn't trying to latch on like it feels you did.



It was early and I missed it. But I like how you stress "the twins". Why did you feel it was important to point that out Wiz? The question is rhetorical as I know the answer and anyone reading it should know also.

Maybe I am missing something, explain to me like I am in kindergarten so I can understand, exactly how did I "latch on" to you. You are very good at using power words and phrases to stress how right you are and make someone look scummy.

As to stressing the twins it was to get your attention. You seemed to gloss over the fact that it was tied when I placed my vote. I had no idea anyone would switch to Noods and yet, I didn't vote there to insure an innocent got lynched. By golly you are right. According to you it was a three way tie of innocents up for the lynch and I didn't go voting one of them like you did with UN. I must be evil.