Mafia 95 - "Mayor's Mansion" (The Play)

LG you thought Lab was scum because she told MC to vote for him. But at the same time you thought MC was the detective?

Tell me how that works.

It doesn't matter if you didn't want to point it out to the mafia, your reasoning for your vote is an obvious lie.

I have not jumped on MC investigating me, in fact I have stated very clearly that I am not letting anything MC said get tied with any invest result. It is impossible to know who he chose N1. You on the other hand are gung ho about him investigating DD and have yet to come up with any other evidence as to why she is scum.
 
LG you thought Lab was scum because she told MC to vote for him. But at the same time you thought MC was the detective?

Tell me how that works.

It doesn't matter if you didn't want to point it out to the mafia, your reasoning for your vote is an obvious lie.

I have not jumped on MC investigating me, in fact I have stated very clearly that I am not letting anything MC said get tied with any invest result. It is impossible to know who he chose N1. You on the other hand are gung ho about him investigating DD and have yet to come up with any other evidence as to why she is scum.
I answered you, if it's not good enough I don't know what to tell you. You believe what you want, and I'll believe what I want.
 
I answered you, if it's not good enough I don't know what to tell you. You believe what you want, and I'll believe what I want.

No, you did not answer my question. You have yet to tell me explain how you thought Lab was communicating with MC if you also thought MC was the det.

But maybe you could pull some more of those posts of Lab's that "really stuck out when [you] read them"?
 
I think it's pretty obvious I believe he invested her. If you want it dropped, why would you respond with a question about it? How is it a defense not to come up with my own thought...it IS my own thought. I responded yo your answer saying thank you for it, you now want to try and turn it into some sort of defense?
I don't necessarily think it should be dropped. I think it's interesting to see who's using that as a basis for their argument. What I mean is, what other evidence do you have against DD? Against anyone else?
 
No, you did not answer my question. You have yet to tell me explain how you thought Lab was communicating with MC if you also thought MC was the det.

But maybe you could pull some more of those posts of Lab's that "really stuck out when [you] read them"?
LOL, you going to try and drag this on until I fold, the way you did MC.
I have been at work all day, what a long day... I have thought about my vote on DD and really you guys have convinced me that my vote for DD was illogical esp jpapp. I guess I ahve some sort of concern for her because of previous games which is really stupid. Anyway, chill has raised a lot of suspicion for me in the last 24 hours and the thing that sticks out to me is how he was content with having a coin toss especially when one who was lynched was an innocent. I RETRACT MY VOTE ON DD and VOTE TO LYNCH CHILL.
The answer is there, as I said if you can't accept, I don't know what to tell you. But since you are trying to act like I didn't answer...I added that to draw attention away
 
LOL, you going to try and drag this on until I fold, the way you did MC.

The answer is there, as I said if you can't accept, I don't know what to tell you. But since you are trying to act like I didn't answer...I added that to draw attention away

LG, what does that answer, at all?

I am questioning YOUR vote here.
 
The only reason you are voting me is because I voted right after night...seems like a weak excuse...lik I said go ahead. I have pretty much exhausted myself explaining my logic and even considering my logic to not be really logical.

Go ahead lynch me, I am sure all of you will regret lynching me or voting for me. I was just trying to build my own case against someone. I was trying to stir up conversation to pull out some info. I have told you all what my logic was i even modified my thinking because of people saying my logic was illogical, which I agree with now.

@ username, why change your vote back to me all of a sudden?

I have been at work all day, what a long day... I have thought about my vote on DD and really you guys have convinced me that my vote for DD was illogical esp jpapp. I guess I ahve some sort of concern for her because of previous games which is really stupid. Anyway, chill has raised a lot of suspicion for me in the last 24 hours and the thing that sticks out to me is how he was content with having a coin toss especially when one who was lynched was an innocent. I RETRACT MY VOTE ON DD and VOTE TO LYNCH CHILL.
No wonder the poor guy was exhausted, I don't think he wanted to change his vote..but was tired of the fight, which Pap you are now trying to do to me...dig enough and pull enough quotes and anyone will crumble and look evil...right Pap

jpapp, I would like to hear your thoughts on who might be mafia and innocent....and why as well as everyone else's thoughts. So far I am the only one to vote and it seems if I have had to defend my choice of voting the whole day...

We cant afford to loose more innocent players this early and the vigilante has already been hit. I would suggest some more posting and would like to hear from a few who havent been posting much to aid in finding some scum.
I didn't see your answer to this Pap, is it because you accomplished your goal, and it didn't matter to you any more?

Well, if they are on the same team and wanted to save Spencer as per your original theory then they obviously failed in doing so as it still came down to a coin toss.

Does it not seem risky to place a vote on a teammate which ties it up and then assume that one of the two people yet to vote would break the tie? Pir had been a no show all day.

So now instead of DD and Dawg working together Dawg may have been on to something regarding DD? How does that play into your first theory or have you scrapped that? You still have not explained how voting for a teammate and getting them tied for the lead at all saves them.

DD tied the vote. That garners attention...she would have not been the kill vote on FF either as he was already in the lead when she placed a vote.


MC, how can you say that "most everyone was convinced [FF] was mafia" and then turn around and say that DD would be obvious in voting FF? Looking back FF's antics certainly gave mafia a good place to hide if they wanted to...

FF was in the lead before DD voted. Had she tacked one on at the end or voted any other person then spencer would have had much lower chance of getting lynched, certainly less than 50%.
Wow, you had your claws in deep trying to twist him didn't ya
 
then why would he not restate DD at the end, instead of naming someone else?

Sorry Rich, I missed this...I don't know, and I can't say you are wrong I just tink he was more frustrated then anything at that time.
 
I would say it was you. I was typing my post when Chill posted that quote from MC. When I scrolled back and saw it it made a lot of sense. I retract my vote on DD

I was hoping it would be as easy as that but it is not. And Chill is right again...MC's invest can't clear you either unfortunately.
What else was Chill "right" about Dawg?
 
AquariaCentral.com